User story #226
Updated by André Neto over 9 years ago
Revisit the current folder layout and naming convention. Restructure to avoid horizontal dependencies.
It was agreed to define tiers and levels:
* Each class will belong to one (and only one) tier and level;
* The first tier does not have any operating system dependencies (basic), the second tier depends on the operating system, the third tier depends in the file system, while the fourth will depend on advanced operating systems (processes, ...)
* The core namespace will be marte.
* The following namespaces will be aligned to the folder name.
h1. Source code files modified
h1. Architecture & design review
*Date of the review:* 08/09/2015
*Person who did the review:* Andre' Neto
*Version of architecture & design document:* N/A. The strategy was discussed and agreed in the sprint review meeting.
*Result of review:* N/A
*List of non-conformities:* N/A
h1. Code and documentation review
*Date of the review:* --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:*
*Result of review:*
*List of non-conformities:* N/A.
h1. Unit test review
*Date of the review:* --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* -----
*Result of coverage tests review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of functional tests review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*List of non-conformities:*
It was agreed to define tiers and levels:
* Each class will belong to one (and only one) tier and level;
* The first tier does not have any operating system dependencies (basic), the second tier depends on the operating system, the third tier depends in the file system, while the fourth will depend on advanced operating systems (processes, ...)
* The core namespace will be marte.
* The following namespaces will be aligned to the folder name.
h1. Source code files modified
h1. Architecture & design review
*Date of the review:* 08/09/2015
*Person who did the review:* Andre' Neto
*Version of architecture & design document:* N/A. The strategy was discussed and agreed in the sprint review meeting.
*Result of review:* N/A
*List of non-conformities:* N/A
h1. Code and documentation review
*Date of the review:* --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:*
*Result of review:*
*List of non-conformities:* N/A.
h1. Unit test review
*Date of the review:* --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* -----
*Result of coverage tests review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of functional tests review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of review:* [PASS/FAIL]
*List of non-conformities:*