User story #236
Updated by Ivan Herrero over 9 years ago
h1. Task description
Update the Makefiles to specify the version of C++
h1. Context
*MISRA C++:2008* is based on C++03 (ISO/IEC 14882:2003)
*For GCC*, For GCC, the option is "-std" with the values c++98, c++03, c++11, and c++14 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html#Standards and https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options), while *for CL*, https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options).
For CL, there is, apparently, no option.
*Warning:* The srv03 machine has the GCC 4.4.7-16 version installed, which only has the labels c++98 (meaning ANSI C++) and c++0x (which Note: MISRA C++:2008 is meant for experimental C++11 features). based on C++03 (ISO/IEC 14882:2003)
*Important:* Before GCC 5.1 support Create type for C++11 was experimental. Some features were implemented based on early proposals, and no attempt was made to maintain backward compatibility when they were updated to match the final C++11 standard. [Source: "C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC":https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html] ClassRegistryDatabase. This will guarantee a consistency usage of the type between AnyType, TypeDescriptor, ClassRegistryItem, ...
h1. Source code files modified
* MakeDefaults/MakeStdLibDefs.linux
h1. Architecture & design review
*Date of the review:* 29/09/2015
*Person who did the review:* André Neto
*Version of architecture & design document:* N/A. As per the original MARTe implementation, this is a support function and does not require formal design in UML.
*Result of review:* N/A
*List of non-conformities:* N/A
h1. Code and documentation review
*Date of the review:* 26/11/2015 [a529df5] --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* Ivan Herrero
*Result of review:* PASS
*List of non-conformities:* N/A N/A.
h1. Unit test review
*Date of the review:* 26/11/2015 [a529df5] --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* Ivan Herrero -----
*Result of coverage tests review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of functional tests review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*List of non-conformities:* N/A
Update the Makefiles to specify the version of C++
h1. Context
*MISRA C++:2008* is based on C++03 (ISO/IEC 14882:2003)
*For GCC*, For GCC, the option is "-std" with the values c++98, c++03, c++11, and c++14 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html#Standards and https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options), while *for CL*, https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html#C-Dialect-Options).
For CL, there is, apparently, no option.
*Warning:* The srv03 machine has the GCC 4.4.7-16 version installed, which only has the labels c++98 (meaning ANSI C++) and c++0x (which Note: MISRA C++:2008 is meant for experimental C++11 features). based on C++03 (ISO/IEC 14882:2003)
*Important:* Before GCC 5.1 support Create type for C++11 was experimental. Some features were implemented based on early proposals, and no attempt was made to maintain backward compatibility when they were updated to match the final C++11 standard. [Source: "C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC":https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html] ClassRegistryDatabase. This will guarantee a consistency usage of the type between AnyType, TypeDescriptor, ClassRegistryItem, ...
h1. Source code files modified
* MakeDefaults/MakeStdLibDefs.linux
h1. Architecture & design review
*Date of the review:* 29/09/2015
*Person who did the review:* André Neto
*Version of architecture & design document:* N/A. As per the original MARTe implementation, this is a support function and does not require formal design in UML.
*Result of review:* N/A
*List of non-conformities:* N/A
h1. Code and documentation review
*Date of the review:* 26/11/2015 [a529df5] --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* Ivan Herrero
*Result of review:* PASS
*List of non-conformities:* N/A N/A.
h1. Unit test review
*Date of the review:* 26/11/2015 [a529df5] --/--/2015
*Person who did the review:* Ivan Herrero -----
*Result of coverage tests review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of functional tests review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*Result of review:* PASS [PASS/FAIL]
*List of non-conformities:* N/A