MARTe2 » MARTe2-core

Implement requirement MARTe-EX-F-1.1.7 based on the original MARTe implementation

Note: Being able to know the number of CPU cores available allow framework developers to take run-time decisions about the distribution of resources (e.g. threading affinity).

h1. Source code files modified

* Source\Core\L0Portability\Architecture\x86_cl\ProcessorA.h
* Source\Core\L0Portability\Architecture\x86_gcc\ProcessorA.h
* Source\Core\L0Portability\OperatingSystem\Linux\ProcessorOS.h
* Source\Core\L0Portability\OperatingSystem\Windows\ProcessorOS.h
* Source\Core\L0Portability\Processor.cpp
* Source\Core\L0Portability\Processor.h
* Source\Core\L0Portability\ProcessorType.cpp
* Source\Core\L0Portability\ProcessorType.h
* Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.h
* Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.cpp
* Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTypeTest.h
* Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTypeTest.cpp
* Test/GTest/ProcessorGTest.cpp
* Test/GTest/ProcessorTypeGTest.cpp

h1. Architecture & design review

*Date of the review:* 12/06/2015

*Person who did the review:* André Neto

*Version of architecture & design document:* N/A. As per the original MARTe implementation, this is a support function and does not require formal design in UML.

*Result of review:* N/A

*List of non-conformities:* N/A

h1. Code and documentation review

*Date of the review:* 18/06/2015

*Person who did the review:* Ivan Herrero

*Result of review:* PASS

*List of non-conformities:* N/A

h1. Unit test review

*Date of the review:* 01/07/2015

*Person who did the review:* Andre Neto

*Result of coverage tests review:* PASS [100%]

*Result of functional tests review:* PASS [100%]

*Result of review:* PASS FAIL

*List of non-conformities:* N/A
Manual review of file: Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.h
Line 25 wrong tab for #define PROCESSORTEST_H_
Line 40 @brief not formatted as per coding standard
Line 52 should read @return true if Processor::VendorId() returns a vendor id which is not NULL.
Line 58 should read @return true if Processor::Family() returns a value which is not -1.
Line 73 should read @return true if Processor::Model() returns a value which is not -1.
Line 88 should read @return true if Processor::Available() returns a value which is not -1.

Manual review of file: Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.cpp
Remove repeated function comments.

Manual review of file: Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTypeTest.h
Line 25 wrong tab for #define PROCESSORTYPETEST_H_
Line 40 @brief not formatted as per coding standard
Line 58 should read @return true if a local test ProcessorType variable can be successfully assigned to two different ProcessorType values.
Line 64 should read @return true if the OR operation between several combinations of a ProcessorType local variable and some ProcessorType dummy test variables are valid.
Line 70 should read @return true if the equality operation between a ProcessorType local variable and a ProcessorType dummy test variables is valid.
Line 76 should read @return true if the inequality operation between a ProcessorType local variable and a ProcessorType dummy test variables is valid.
Line 82 should read @return true if the ProcessorType default CPUs can be successfully set and retrieved.
Line 90 should read @return true if all the ProcessorType constructors can be successfully assigned to the expected initial CPU mask.