User story #123
MARTe-EX-F-1.1.8: A framework developer shall be capble of querying the family and model of the CPU where MARTe is running.
0%
Description
Implement requirement MARTe-EX-F-1.1.8 based on the original MARTe implementation
Note: Being able to know the number CPU family and model may allow framework developers to take run-time decisions about the distribution of resources (e.g. availability of operating system specific features).
NOTE: User story moved back to implementation in order to fix complex bug (found by Llorenc)
Source code files modified¶
- Source\Core\L0Portability\Architecture\x86_cl\ProcessorA.h
- Source\Core\L0Portability\Architecture\x86_gcc\ProcessorA.h
- Source\Core\L0Portability\OperatingSystem\Linux\ProcessorOS.h
- Source\Core\L0Portability\OperatingSystem\Windows\ProcessorOS.h
- Source\Core\L0Portability\Processor.cpp
- Source\Core\L0Portability\Processor.h
- Source\Core\L0Portability\ProcessorType.cpp
- Source\Core\L0Portability\ProcessorType.h
- Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.h
- Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTest.cpp
- Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTypeTest.h
- Test/Core/L0Portability/ProcessorTypeTest.cpp
- Test/GTest/ProcessorGTest.cpp
- Test/GTest/ProcessorTypeGTest.cpp
Architecture & design review¶
Date of the review: 12/06/2015
Person who did the review: André Neto
Version of architecture & design document: N/A. As per the original MARTe implementation, this is a support function and does not require formal design in UML.
Result of review: N/A
Code and documentation review¶
Date of the review: 18/06/2015
Person who did the review: Ivan Herrero
Result of review: PASS
List of non-conformities: N/A
Unit test review¶
Date of the review: 01/07/2015
Person who did the review: André Neto
Result of coverage tests review: PASS [100%]
Result of functional tests review: PASS [100%]
Result of review: PASS
List of non-conformities: N/A
See #122
Associated revisions
US #123 - Processor and ProcessorType test updated.
List of changes:
* Printf added on the ProcessorTest.cpp in order check that the
infomation about the CUP is correct.
* Minor modification on the ProcessorTypeTest.cpp.
* Format files.
Fixed processor model reported in #123. Implementation of #156.
The bug related to the computation of the processor model was fixed (see
comment in #123).
As part of the linting process (#156) the code structure was slightly
changed in order to delegate the implementation of the Processor
operating system functionality to a .cpp unit. This improves the
consistency with the other operating system classes.
History
#1 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Target version changed from Backlog to 0.1
- Start date deleted (
29.05.2015) - Estimated time set to 2.00 h
#2 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Arch: Rev
#3 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Assignee set to André Neto
#4 Updated by André Neto almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#5 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Arch: Rev to Code: Impl
#6 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Assignee changed from André Neto to Giuseppe Ferro
#7 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#8 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#9 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Code: Impl to Code: Rev
#10 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#11 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Code: Rev to Unit: Impl
#12 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Giuseppe Ferro)
#13 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#14 Updated by Ivan Herrero almost 10 years ago
Code and documentation review passed. Unit testing implementation pending.
#15 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Unit: Impl to Unit: Rev
#16 Updated by André Neto almost 10 years ago
- Assignee set to André Neto
#17 Updated by André Neto almost 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#18 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Status changed from Unit: Rev to Unit: Impl
#19 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
André Neto)
#20 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli almost 10 years ago
- Target version changed from 0.1 to 0.2
#21 Updated by Llorenc Capella over 9 years ago
- Assignee set to Llorenc Capella
#22 Updated by Llorenc Capella over 9 years ago
- Status changed from Unit: Impl to Unit: Rev
#23 Updated by Llorenc Capella over 9 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
Llorenc Capella)
The ProcessorTest only check that the returned values of the class are meaningless, but does not check if the values are correct...
I print the returned values on the screen and I compared them with the lscpu. As a result I found that the Model from the test and using the lscpu command is different.
#24 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli over 9 years ago
- Status changed from Unit: Rev to Code: Impl
#25 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli over 9 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#26 Updated by Ivan Herrero over 9 years ago
Llorenc Capella wrote:
The ProcessorTest only check that the returned values of the class are meaningless, but does not check if the values are correct...
I print the returned values on the screen and I compared them with the lscpu. As a result I found that the Model from the test and using the lscpu command is different.
In fact there is a bug in the implementation, or better, the implementation is not complete:
Intel and AMD have suggested applications to display the family of a CPU as the sum of the "Family" and the "Extended Family" fields shown above, and the model as the sum of the "Model" and the 4-bit left-shifted "Extended Model" fields. If "Family" is different than 6 or 15, only the "Family" and "Model" fields should be used while the "Extended Family" and "Extended Model" bits are reserved. If "Family" is set to 15, then "Extended Family" and the 4-bit left-shifted "Extended Model" should be added to the respective base values, and if "Family" is set to 6, then only the 4-bit left-shifted "Extended Model" should be added to "Model". [Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPUID]
It needs to be reimplemented.
#27 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli over 9 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#28 Updated by Riccardo Vitelli over 9 years ago
- Status changed from Code: Impl to Closed
Added processor related functions. #122 #123